#amd epyc vs intel xeon

[praptihostgermany]

Dedicated Server Germany

How to Choose the Right Dedicated Server in Germany: A Complete Guide

Are you wondering how to choose the right Dedicated Server in Germany? With the increasing demand for secure, high-performance hosting, businesses must find reliable, scalable, and cost-effective solutions that align with their specific requirements. 

A dedicated server is an excellent choice for businesses looking for complete control, maximum security, and superior performance. However, selecting the best-dedicated server in Germany requires careful consideration of multiple factors.

In this comprehensive guide, we will discuss the key aspects of choosing a dedicated server in Germany, including performance, security, scalability, pricing, and provider reputation. 

By the end of this blog, you will understand how to pick the best German dedicated server for your business needs.

Understanding the Importance of a Dedicated Server in Germany

A dedicated server is a physical server exclusively allocated to a single client. 

Unlike shared hosting or VPS hosting, a dedicated server offers better performance, enhanced security, and full customization options.

Germany is one of Europe's leading data center locations, known for its robust infrastructure, strict data protection laws (GDPR compliance), and high-speed connectivity. 

Businesses looking for low-latency hosting in Europe often choose German data centers for their reliability and advanced security measures.

Choosing the Right Dedicated Server: Key Considerations

If you select a Germany Dedicated Server, it's crucial to consider several factors to ensure high performance, security, and scalability. 

Some of the essential factors you must consider are:

i. Understanding Your Business Needs

Before choosing a dedicated server, you must evaluate your business requirements and determine what kind of performance and security features you need. 

Every business has different hosting needs, and selecting the wrong configuration can lead to underperformance or unnecessary expenses.

Questions to Ask Before Selecting a Dedicated Server

• What type of website or application will be hosted on the server?

• How much traffic do you expect?

• Do you need high processing power for complex applications?

• What level of security and data protection is required?

• Will your hosting needs grow over time?

By assessing these factors, you can choose a dedicated server with the right resources to meet your current and future requirements.

2. Selecting the Right Hardware Specifications

The hardware components of a dedicated server play a crucial role in its performance and efficiency. Based on your workload, it is essential to choose the right combination of CPU, RAM, storage, and bandwidth.

Processor (CPU)

• A multi-core processor is necessary for handling high-traffic and intensive workloads.

• Intel Xeon and AMD EPYC processors are widely used for dedicated hosting due to their reliability and speed.

• A dual-core or quad-core processor may be sufficient for basic hosting, but high-performance applications require eight cores or more.

RAM (Memory)

• More RAM ensures faster processing and better performance.

• A minimum of 16GB RAM is recommended for standard applications, while 32GB or higher is ideal for high-traffic websites.

• Opt for higher RAM capacity if your business relies on databases and real-time processing.

Storage Type (HDD vs. SSD)

• SSD (Solid State Drive) is faster and more reliable than HDD. It is ideal for performance-driven applications.

• HDD (Hard Disk Drive) is cost-effective and suitable for ample storage but has slower speeds.

• NVMe SSDs offer the fastest read/write speeds, making them perfect for high-traffic websites.

Bandwidth and Network Speed

• Higher bandwidth ensures smoother traffic management and data transfer.

• Choose unmetered bandwidth or a 1Gbps connection for businesses with heavy traffic.

3. Ensuring Strong Security and Data Protection

Security is critical, primarily if your business handles customer data, financial transactions, or confidential information. Germany has strict GDPR compliance laws, so ensuring data protection and cybersecurity is a top priority.

Essential Security Features

• DDoS Protection – Shields against large-scale cyberattacks that can disrupt business operations.

• Firewall and Intrusion Prevention – Helps prevent unauthorized access and hacking attempts.

• SSL Encryption – Ensures secure communication between the server and users.

• Regular Malware Scanning – Detects and removes security threats.

• Automated Backups – Ensures data safety in case of system failures or cyberattacks.

Secure, dedicated Germany Dedicated Servers protect your business from cyber threats and ensure compliance with data protection laws.

4. Scalability and Future-Proofing Your Server

Your business needs may evolve, so choosing a dedicated server for easy upgrades and scalability is essential.

Scalability Features to Consider

• Ability to increase CPU, RAM, and storage as traffic grows.

• Flexible bandwidth options to handle unexpected surges in traffic.

• Hybrid hosting solutions that integrate with cloud services.

• Load balancing to optimize performance across multiple servers.

A scalable dedicated server ensures your website or application can grow without frequent migrations or downtime.

5. Choosing Between Managed and Unmanaged Dedicated Servers

Businesses must decide between a managed or unmanaged hosting solution when selecting a Germany Dedicated Server.

Managed Dedicated Server

• The hosting provider handles server setup, security updates, monitoring, and troubleshooting.

• Best for businesses without in-house IT teams.

• Ensures 24/7 technical support for quick problem resolution.

• Reduces the risk of server downtime and security breaches.

Unmanaged Dedicated Server

• Users handle server maintenance, configuration, and security updates on their own.

• Requires technical expertise in server administration.

• Offers complete control over the hosting environment.

• Best suited for businesses with dedicated IT staff.

A managed dedicated server is the best choice if you want hassle-free hosting. However, an unmanaged server may be the right option if you prefer complete control.

6. Evaluating Pricing and Cost Considerations

Dedicated servers have various price points depending on hardware, bandwidth, security features, and management level. 

While budget is important, businesses should focus on value for money instead of selecting the cheapest option.

Factors That Affect Dedicated Server Pricing

• Hardware Configuration – More powerful servers cost more.

• Bandwidth and Data Transfer Limits – Higher bandwidth means higher costs.

• Security Features – Extra security, like DDoS protection and firewalls, may add costs.

• Managed vs. Unmanaged Hosting – Managed servers are more expensive but provide expert support.

• Data Center Location and Quality – Premium data centers with Tier 3 or Tier 4 ratings may cost more.

It is advisable to compare multiple providers to find the best plan that meets your needs within your budget.

7. Selecting a Reliable Hosting Provider in Germany

The quality of your hosting provider determines your server’s performance, security, and uptime. A trusted hosting provider ensures better customer support, advanced infrastructure, and reliable service.

What to Look for in a Hosting Provider?

• Reputation and Customer Reviews – Check the reviews of Trustpilot, Google, and hosting forums.

• Data Center Infrastructure – Look for Tier 3 or Tier 4 data centers for high reliability.

• 24/7 Customer Support – Ensure round-the-clock chat, email, or phone assistance.

• 99.9% Uptime Guarantee – Reduces the risk of website downtime.

Final Thoughts

Choosing the correct dedicated server Germany involves evaluating hardware, security, scalability, and provider reliability. A well-optimized server enhances website performance, security, and user experience.

Businesses can ensure efficient operations and strong data protection by selecting a reliable hosting provider.

For businesses looking for premium German dedicated servers, PraptiHost offers fully managed solutions with top-tier performance and security.

Explore our Clearance Dedicated Servers plans today and get the best-dedicated server for your business needs! 

[computer8920]

Intel vs AMD: A Deep Dive into the Ongoing Processor Battle

In the ever-evolving world of computer hardware, Intel and AMD have been locked in a fierce competition for processor supremacy. This rivalry has fueled tremendous innovation, pushing both companies to create CPUs that offer the best performance, efficiency, and value for consumers. From their historical beginnings to the current market dynamics, this battle continues to shape the landscape of modern computing.

Historical Background

The Intel vs. AMD rivalry dates back to the 1980s when AMD entered the microprocessor market. Intel had already established itself as the dominant player with its x86 architecture, but AMD quickly became a worthy adversary by introducing processors that were compatible with Intel’s design while also offering more affordable alternatives. This competition laid the foundation for a series of innovations, where both companies continually sought to outpace each other in speed, efficiency, and features.

Over the years, Intel and AMD have each pushed the boundaries of CPU technology. Their rivalry has given consumers a wide variety of processors to choose from, catering to diverse needs and budgets, thus benefiting the tech community at large.

Current Market Dynamics

Today, Intel and AMD continue to battle for market share across multiple segments, including consumer desktops and laptops, high-performance computing, and server markets. Both companies offer a range of processors designed for specific use cases, leading to competitive pricing and performance improvements.

Consumer Desktops and Laptops

In the consumer market, Intel and AMD target users with different performance levels. Intel’s Core i3, i5, i7, and i9 series compete directly with AMD’s Ryzen 3, 5, 7, and 9 processors. The choice often boils down to individual needs—whether it's gaming, content creation, or multitasking.

AMD has made notable strides in recent years with its Ryzen series, which provides more cores and threads than Intel’s offerings at similar price points. This makes AMD appealing to users requiring excellent multi-threaded performance for tasks like video editing, rendering, and gaming.

High-Performance Computing

For power users in fields like 3D modeling, video production, and scientific simulations, Intel’s Core X-Series and AMD’s Ryzen Threadripper are the go-to processors. Both companies have focused on delivering top-tier performance for these demanding applications, often leveraging cutting-edge technology to gain an edge.

Server and Data Center

The battle extends to the server and data center markets, where Intel’s Xeon processors and AMD’s EPYC chips compete for dominance. AMD has made significant inroads with EPYC, challenging Intel’s long-standing lead in this space with processors that offer high core counts and superior performance-per-dollar ratios.

Key Differentiators

Several factors differentiate Intel and AMD processors, influencing the choice of consumers and businesses alike.

Architecture: Intel uses its x86 architecture, while AMD employs its AMD64 architecture. Both designs differ in instruction execution and power efficiency.

Manufacturing Process: Both companies have advanced their manufacturing processes. Intel historically led in this area, but AMD has caught up with its shift to 7nm and 5nm processes, closing the performance gap.

Integrated Graphics: Intel processors often feature integrated graphics. At the same time, AMD’s Ryzen chips also offer integrated Radeon graphics, making them strong contenders for users who want decent graphics performance without a dedicated GPU.

Price-Performance Ratio: AMD has built a reputation for offering competitive price-to-performance ratios, providing more cores at lower prices. Intel, however, focuses on specialized features like Quick Sync for video encoding and Thunderbolt support.

Conclusion

The Intel vs. AMD rivalry continues to drive advancements in CPU technology, ensuring consumers have access to cutting-edge, competitively priced processors. Whether you're focused on gaming, content creation, or enterprise-level computing, both companies offer compelling options that cater to various needs. Ultimately, the ongoing competition between Intel and AMD benefits consumers, guaranteeing powerful, efficient processors and pushing the boundaries of what’s possible in computing.

Want to Buy Intel and AMD CPUs in Bulk at Affordable Prices from VSTL?

VSTL offers a wide selection of processors from leading brands, ensuring high performance, efficiency, and competitive pricing. Whether you need processors for desktops, laptops, or high-performance computing, VSTL provides bulk purchasing options tailored to your needs. With access to the latest models and excellent customer service, buying Intel and AMD CPUs in bulk from VSTL is a smart choice for businesses and tech enthusiasts looking to save while upgrading their systems.

[govindhtech]

Powerful AMD EPYC 9654 Beats 5th Gen Intel Xeon Processors

AMD EPYC Gen 4 vs Intel Xeon 5th Gen: A Battle for Server Supremacy

The recent availability of 5th Gen Intel Xeon processors allows testing of 4th Gen AMD EPYC CPUs on critical workloads. AMD EPYC 9654 beats competitors in data centre performance, power efficiency, and cost. AMD EPYC CPU hold over 300 performance world records, and Intel’s latest release maintains our lead. Over 250 server designs and 800 cloud instances comprise AMD EPYC.

SPECpower

Modern data centers manage power utilization to meet growing needs, save costs, and satisfy environmental goals. The System Under Test’s power and performance are used to compare volume server class computers’ energy efficiency in the SPECpower ssj 2008 benchmark. SPECpower was the first industry benchmark for single- and multi-node server power and performance.

Consumers can compare server and configuration energy efficiency using the SPECpower ssj 2008 benchmark. This benchmark applies to hardware, IT, OEM, and government companies. The SPECpower ssj 2008 statistic assesses SUT power efficiency as “overall ssj ops/watt”. It is the ratio of the overall throughput ssj ops, which is the sum of all target load scores, to their average watt power consumption.

AMD EPYC 9754

AMD EPYC 4th Gen excels at power efficiency. A dual-socket system with 128-core AMD EPYC 9754 processors outscored Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+ by 2.25x.

AMD EPYC 9554

Industry benchmarks for compute-intensive jobs include the SPEC CPU 2017 test, which stresses the processor, memory subsystem, and compiler on various computer systems. This blog discusses SPECrate 2017 Integer and Floating Point, two of SPEC CPU 2017’s four suites’ 43 benchmarks.

On SPECrate 2017, 32-core AMD EPYC 9374F machine surpasses Intel Xeon Scalable 8562Y+ by ~1.14x (base) and ~1.06x (64 cores). 2P 64-core AMD EPYC 9554 systems outperform Intel Xeon Scalable 8592+ in SPECrate 2017 and similar.

Top performer: SPECrate 2017 ranked 2P 64-core Intel Xeon Scalable 8592+ behind 2P 96-core AMD EPYC 9654. SPECjbb2015 was considered simulates a corporate IT infrastructure that handles point-of-sale requests, online transactions, and data-mining to test server-side Java applications. Because Java is so popular, JVM providers, hardware manufacturers, Java application developers, academics, and academia should evaluate this benchmark.

AMD EPYC 9554 64-core processor

64 cores A dual-socket 64-core AMD EPYC 9554 machine performs comparably to an Intel Xeon Scalable 8592+ on SPECjbb 2015 MultiJVM-maxJOPS.

Top of stack: A dual-socket 96-core general purpose AMD EPYC 9654 machine outperforms a 64-core Intel Xeon Scalable 8592+ system 1.48x on SPECjbb 2015 MultiJVM-maxJOPS.

Decision Support System

The decision support benchmark TPC Benchmark H (TPC-H) evaluates systems that handle complex business queries by running sophisticated queries over big datasets. This benchmark’s queries and data manipulations affect several industries.

TPC-H’s Composite Query-per-Hour Performance Metric (QphH Size) evaluates query processing. When handling concurrent user requests, database sizes, query stream processing, and query throughput are considered. A system’s price-performance ratio, or “bang for the buck,” is likewise assessed by TPC-H.

A 2P 64-core AMD EPYC 9554 system outperforms a 2P Intel Xeon Scalable 8592+ system by ~1.14x and ~1.22x at SF 10000 in price-performance TPC-H.

Business Uses

Key SAP ERP logistics module is SAP Sales and Distribution (SAP SD). SAP Application Performance Standard units’ database efficiency is measured using the SAP-SD 2-Tier benchmark to assess hardware performance. SAPS is hardware-independent and uses the Sales and Distribution (SD) benchmark to evaluate SAP systems. Recently, a 2P system with 96-core AMD EPYC 9654 processors outscored a 64-core Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+ by ~1.53x. For further information, refer to my blog post “4th Gen AMD EPYC CPUs Empower SAP SD 2-Tier Performance.”

In four generations of general-purpose AMD EPYC processors, “top of stack” CPU SKUs enhanced performance. It also indicates that AMD EPYC 2nd Gen and later outperform Intel Xeon processors.

The Virtualization Infrastructure

VMmark 3 benchmarks virtualized server performance, power efficiency, and scalability on physical hardware under intense loads. Server capabilities and virtualization solutions are compared for strengths and limitations.

AMD EPYC 9654

A 2P 64-core AMD EPYC 9554 machine outperforms a 2P Intel Xeon Scalable 8592+ system 1.29x on VMmark 3. In VMmark 3, a 2P 96-core AMD EPYC 9654 system outperforms a 2P 64-core Intel Xeon Scalable 8592+ system by ~1.60x.

Powerful computing

HPC predicts major climate events and enhances transit and infrastructure safety, making it part of almost every modern activity. Optimizing material use, simplifying designs, and lowering development costs lowers prices. Rapid virtual prototyping reduces physical testing and speeds market entry.

Demand for HPC workload performance rises. Performance increases enable faster simulations, shorter product development cycles, more scenario testing, and finer model tweaks, making products more effective and efficient. Explore 4th Gen AMD EPYC CPUs HPC dominance.

AMD EPYC 9374F

CFD models and studies fluid behavior like water flowing around a boat hull or air around a vehicle or aircraft using numerical analysis. Uses include industrial and consumer goods. Memory bandwidth limits computationally demanding CFD activities.

Altair AcuSolve: Without CFD, Altair AcuSolve allows organizations investigate ideas using flow, heat transfer, turbulence, and non-Newtonian material analysis. In AcuSolve’s acus-in test, a 2P 32-core AMD EPYC 9374F machine surpasses an Intel Xeon Scalable 8562Y+ system by ~1.46x. Ansys CFX: High-performance CFD software provides fast, reliable, and accurate solutions for a variety of CFD and Multiphysics applications. In several CFX tests, a 32-core AMD EPYC 9374F machine outperformed an Intel Xeon Scalable 8562Y+ system by ~1.48x. Ansys Fluent: Advanced physics modelling and industry-leading accuracy characterize this fluid simulation package. A 2P 32-core AMD EPYC 9374F machine outperformed a 2P Intel Xeon Scalable 8562Y+ system performance ~1.25x in chosen Fluent tests.

OpenFOAM CFD software is free and open-source. Academic and commercial institutions use it. In OpenFOAM tests, a 2P 64-core AMD EPYC 9554 system outperformed an Intel Xeon Scalable 8592+ and a top-of-stack general purpose system by ~1.14x. A 2P 96-core AMD EPYC 9654 system outscored a 64-core Intel Scalable 8592+ system by ~1.22 in FEA Clear.

An explicit Finite Element Analysis (FEA) numerical simulation evaluates structures and materials under dynamic situations like impacts, explosions, and crashes. The auto industry uses FEA to predict crash behavior and evaluate occupant safety. Cell phone manufacturers use FEA to simulate drop tests for durability. Simulations save manufacturers time and money by testing designs online instead of prototyping.

These simulations involve complex digital replicas of items like cars and phones. To reproduce dynamic events like impacts, models solve differential equations over time. Model part interactions are assessed for deformations or failures. The calculations demand lots of memory and processing power. Due to model interconnectivity, compute nodes must communicate to exchange information about model elements’ effects.

AMD EPYC 9374F Benchmark

A prominent explicit simulation programme is Ansys LS-DYNA. Complex short-duration events in automobile, aircraft, construction, military, manufacturing, and biotechnology are simulated. In some LS-DYNA tests, the 2P 32-core AMD EPYC 9374F machine outperformed the Intel Xeon Scalable 8562Y+ system by ~1.50x.

Altair Radioss measures impact or crash structures. It benchmarks hardware using common usage issues. The 2P 32-core AMD EPYC 9374F system outperformed the Intel Xeon Scalable 8562Y+ workstation by ~1.25x in some Radioss tests.

AMD EPYC 9654 96-core processor

Molecular Dynamics

Newton’s equations are solved using molecular dynamics to analyze atoms and molecules. Molecular systems can be studied by analyzing material behavior, protein folding, and chemical processes. For hundreds to millions of particles, GROMACS simulates Newtonian motion using modular dynamics. A 2P 64-core AMD EPYC 9554 system provides ~1.24x the average performance of an Intel Xeon Scalable 8592+ system, outperforming competing datacenter CPUs. A top-of-the-stack 2P 96-core AMD EPYC 9654 machine outperforms Intel CPU systems by ~1.63x in GROMACS tests.

AMD EPYC 9554 64-core processor

Quantum chemistry

Quantum chemistry illuminates bonding and reactions through molecule structure, energetics, and reactivity. In quantum chemistry and solid-state physics, CP2K duplicates atomic systems. 2P 64-core AMD EPYC 9554 system outscored Intel Xeon Scalable 8592+ by ~1.27x in H2O-dft-ls test, whereas top-of-stack The AMD EPYC 9654 outperformed the Intel processing system by ~1.62 (Weather Forecast).

The conus2.5km test showed a 2P 64-core AMD EPYC 9554 system outperforming a 2P Intel Xeon Scalable 8592+ system by ~1.30x, and a top-of-the-line 2P 96-core AMD EPYC 9654 system outperforming the Intel system by ~1.50.

Conclusion

This blog revealed that 4th Gen AMD EPYC processors outperformed 5th Gen Intel Xeons in critical tasks. The comparisons above show that 4th Gen AMD EPYC CPUs perform well and reliably in industry-critical tasks. 4th Gen AMD EPYC CPUs excel in virtualized environments, molecular dynamics, and quantum chemistry simulations. Leading operating systems, hypervisors, and cloud services support AMD EPYC CPUs. The AMD Documentation Hub offers BIOS and OS tunings for different workloads to improve performance.

AMD delivers innovative technology beyond processors:

AMD Instinct Accelerators: These accelerators assist scientists tackle complex challenges in various industries through exascale discoveries. They power scientific research, data analytics, machine learning, and other demanding applications with high-performance computing.

AMD Pensando DPUs enable cloud, computing, networking, storage, and security software-defined programming. These technologies improve productivity, performance, and scalability over present infrastructures wherever data is. Programmable infrastructure pieces provide data centre agility.

AMD FPGAs, hardware-adaptive SoCs, and ACAP processing platforms are adaptable and adaptive. These technologies boost endpoint, edge, and cloud infrastructure innovation.

Developers can adapt and optimize solutions for specific applications and use cases, enhancing processing efficiency.

Read more on govindhtech.com

[dedicated-server-blog]

Select Cheap Dedicated Servers Germany Plans

You can prevent sticker shock by signing a long-term contract with one of the cheap European dedicated server hosts and locking in the lowest rates for single-tenant hardware. Clients are assigned a specific server in a data center rack, and they can use a managed or unmanaged platform.

Single-tenant guarantee in a data center with rack-mounted hardware autonomy is the primary need for dedicated server hosting. In shared hosting, multiple users may use a single server. Virtual private server plans allow numerous users to share a single kernel and accompanying resources to support a single piece of hardware. Germany-dedicated server hosting can be purchased from different providers in bare metal, unmanaged, or managed configurations.

Understand the budgeting for Germany's dedicated servers:

Choosing the best cheap dedicated server plan can be overwhelming, but with some research and careful consideration, you can find a great option that fits your needs and budget. For example, a cheap 10gbps Germany server is essential for operating a video streaming website or a seedbox. Its monthly fees might begin at $120.

Cost-effective hosts offer single-tenant hardware at pricing that is competitive with VPS plans. On average, most dedicated server options cost between $450 and $499 per month. More than 10,000 people should be able to access the server at once.

VPS options can offer more significant configurations or faster performance with SSD storage drives and compete with cheaper dedicated server plans that cost less than $50 monthly. Paying for dedicated servers is a significant investment, so ensure you need one before making the plunge.

Tips for choosing the cheap dedicated server hosting plan:

Comparing hosting rates might help you locate the greatest deal on hardware in the business if you emphasize cost performance as determined by benchmark testing.

The best-dedicated server plans offer great value for the price, with plenty of cores, threads, RAM, and storage to meet your needs.

By conducting an IT audit on your resources, you can find exactly what you need before signing up for a dedicated server plan. By utilizing third-party benchmarks, you can quickly obtain performance information on the Intel Xeon and AMD EPYC CPUs provided by web host companies.

The commodity approach is excellent for bare metal server usage in a data center network. You can compare the CPU, RAM, storage (HDD vs. SSD), and bandwidth options, just like buying copper or sugar by the pound. This means you can find the best deals and save money.

It's great to have options when it comes to dedicated servers! While managed and unmanaged plans differ, bare metal plans offer affordable pricing and the flexibility to install the necessary stack. You can easily find managed plans with excellent customer service that provides live chat and quick response times.

Ask about a bulk of helpful information for choosing the best-dedicated server plans! With this information, you'll be able to make a wise decision and find the perfect plan to meet your needs: 

Growth in monthly page views for hosting resources is significant.

The Cloud software, websites, or mobile apps will require optimal web traffic.

When choosing plans, high-performance hardware and value for money are essential factors.

Apps can support many microservices, databases, and programming languages!

[eu100tb]

Select Cheap Dedicated Servers Germany Plans

You can prevent sticker shock by signing a long-term contract with one of the cheap European dedicated server hosts and locking in the lowest rates for single-tenant hardware. Clients are assigned a specific server in a data center rack, and they can use a managed or unmanaged platform.

Single-tenant guarantee in a data center with rack-mounted hardware autonomy is the primary need for dedicated server hosting. In shared hosting, multiple users may use a single server. Virtual private server plans allow numerous users to share a single kernel and accompanying resources to support a single piece of hardware. Germany-dedicated server hosting can be purchased from different providers in bare metal, unmanaged, or managed configurations.

Understand the budgeting for Germany's dedicated servers:

Choosing the best cheap dedicated server plan can be overwhelming, but with some research and careful consideration, you can find a great option that fits your needs and budget. For example, a cheap 10gbps Germany server is essential for operating a video streaming website or a seedbox. Its monthly fees might begin at $120.

Cost-effective hosts offer single-tenant hardware at pricing that is competitive with VPS plans. On average, most dedicated server options cost between $450 and $499 per month. More than 10,000 people should be able to access the server at once.

VPS options can offer more significant configurations or faster performance with SSD storage drives and compete with cheaper dedicated server plans that cost less than $50 monthly. Paying for dedicated servers is a significant investment, so ensure you need one before making the plunge.

Tips for choosing the cheap dedicated server hosting plan:

Comparing hosting rates might help you locate the greatest deal on hardware in the business if you emphasize cost performance as determined by benchmark testing.

The best-dedicated server plans offer great value for the price, with plenty of cores, threads, RAM, and storage to meet your needs.

By conducting an IT audit on your resources, you can find exactly what you need before signing up for a dedicated server plan. By utilizing third-party benchmarks, you can quickly obtain performance information on the Intel Xeon and AMD EPYC CPUs provided by web host companies.

The commodity approach is excellent for bare metal server usage in a data center network. You can compare the CPU, RAM, storage (HDD vs. SSD), and bandwidth options, just like buying copper or sugar by the pound. This means you can find the best deals and save money.

It's great to have options when it comes to dedicated servers! While managed and unmanaged plans differ, bare metal plans offer affordable pricing and the flexibility to install the necessary stack. You can easily find managed plans with excellent customer service that provides live chat and quick response times.

Ask about a bulk of helpful information for choosing the best-dedicated server plans! With this information, you'll be able to make a wise decision and find the perfect plan to meet your needs: 

Growth in monthly page views for hosting resources is significant.

The Cloud software, websites, or mobile apps will require optimal web traffic.

When choosing plans, high-performance hardware and value for money are essential factors.

Apps can support many microservices, databases, and programming languages!

[dailytechnologynews]

1-Socket 32-Core Showdown: Intel Xeon Gold 6314U vs AMD EPYC 7543P https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e96mboM155g

[wajeracpu]

Mastercam 2018 hardware acceleration 無料ダウンロード.Camtasia 2018 Hardware Acceleration

Mastercam 2018 hardware acceleration 無料ダウンロード.Mastercam HLE Software FAQ

                                                                          Camtasia 2018 Hardware Acceleration.Camtasia Hardware Acceleration - Digital Nomad Rockstar

    Camtasia Hardware acceleration bugs. Howdy! First time really learning Camtasia. I made a couple videos, found the software intuitive and powerful. However, the colors on the videos both in the canvas and in the final export are washed out. The colors are flat and it looks like there's a film of grey over the whole thing, like there's Dec 20,  · To disable MasterCAM hardware acceleration, follow the following steps. Within MasterCAM, select Settings, Configuration. Click Screen on the left-hand side of the window to display the screen and Author: Reich Web Consulting Dec 01,  · PassMark Software has delved into the millions of benchmark results that PerformanceTest users have posted to its web site and produced a comprehensive range of CPU charts to help compare the relative speeds of different processors from Intel, AMD, Apple, Qualcomm and others. Included in these lists are CPUs designed for servers and workstations     

Mastercam 2018 hardware acceleration 無料ダウンロード.HLE FAQ - CamInstructor

Dec 01,  · PassMark Software has delved into the millions of benchmark results that PerformanceTest users have posted to its web site and produced a comprehensive range of CPU charts to help compare the relative speeds of different processors from Intel, AMD, Apple, Qualcomm and others. Included in these lists are CPUs designed for servers and workstations PDF | Hardware/Software CoDesign for Mathematical Function Acceleration | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate Camtasia Hardware acceleration bugs. Howdy! First time really learning Camtasia. I made a couple videos, found the software intuitive and powerful. However, the colors on the videos both in the canvas and in the final export are washed out. The colors are flat and it looks like there's a film of grey over the whole thing, like there's         

 PassMark Software has delved into the millions of benchmark results that PerformanceTest users have posted to its web site and produced a comprehensive range of CPU charts to help compare the relative speeds of different processors from Intel, AMD, Apple, Qualcomm and others. Included in these lists are CPUs designed for servers and workstations such as Intel Xeon and AMD EPYC processors , desktop CPUs Intel Core Series and AMD Ryzen , in addition to ARM processors Apple M1 and Qualcomm Snapdragon and mobile CPUs.

PerformanceTest conducts eight different tests and then averages the results together to determine the CPU Mark rating for a system. To ensure that the full CPU power of a PC system is realized, PerformanceTest runs each CPU test on all available CPUs. Specifically, PerformanceTest runs one simultaneous CPU test for every logical CPU Hyper-threaded ; physical CPU core dual core or physical CPU package multiple CPU chips. So hypothetically if you have a PC that has two CPUs, each with dual cores that use hyper-threading, then PerformanceTest will run eight simultaneous tests Rarely is a graph completely accurate in what it is representing.

There are many factors that can skew the results and make a graph misleading. As such it is necessary to have some background understanding of the data being presented. Download and install PerformanceTest.

Your results will not appear in the graphs immediately as the graphs are only updated once per day. Additionally, only CPUs of which there are at least two samples are included in the graphs. CPU Benchmarks. CPU Benchmarks Over 1,, CPUs benchmarked. cpus High End High Mid Range Low Mid Range Low End Best Value On Market Best Value XY Scatter Best Value All time New Desktop New Laptop Single Thread Systems with Multiple CPUs Overclocked Power Performance CPU Mark by Socket Type Cross-Platform CPU Performance CPU Mega List Search Model Compare 0 Common Most Benchmarked AMD vs Intel Market Share Year on Year Performance.

Intel Core iE 2. AMD Ryzen Embedded VB Quad-core 2.

[govindhtech]

Intel vs AMD: EPYC Siena rivals Sapphire Rapids with less power

AMD EPYC Siena Performance

Both of AMD’s new Zen 4c equipped EPYC 8324P and 8324PN (Siena) server CPUs were recently tested in Linux by Phoronix, and the results showed that both chips deliver exceptional performance when used in server applications. Phoronix’s tests revealed that both of AMD’s Zen 4c processors were capable of matching the performance of an Intel Xeon Gold 6421N 32-core CPU in most tasks, although using a far lower amount of power than the Intel processor.

AMD’s EPYC most recent range of EPYC server CPUs, the 8004 series, focuses on power economy rather than sheer CPU performance. This is reflected in the 8324P and 8324PN models of the EPYC server CPUs. The new Zen 4c core, which is included into all of AMD’s 8004 processors, is 35% more compact than its predecessor, Zen 4, and boasts improved power efficiency compared to Zen 4’s bigger version. The raw performance of an AMD Zen 4c core is lower than that of a normal Zen 4 core. This is the single drawback of the Zen 4c core.

The 8324P and PN are located squarely in the centre of the CPU stack for AMD’s 8004 series. They include 32 cores, 128 MB of L3 cache, six DDR5 memory channels, and 96 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. They are distinct from one another in terms of clock speeds and power ratings; for example, the 8324P has a base clock of 2.65 GHz, a boost clock of 3 GHz, and a TDP of 180W. The 8324PN, on the other hand, has a base speed of 2.05 GHz, a boost frequency of 3 GHz, and a TDP that is significantly lower at 130 watts.

This is due to the fact that the PN series of 8004 CPUs were developed specifically for installations that must comply with the Network Equipment Building System (NEBS), which calls for systems that are able to survive higher operational temperature ranges than ordinary chips.

Low Power Draw AMD EPYC Siena

Phoronix evaluated the performance of the two chips in a variety of different benchmarks, which together equate to seven distinct categories. These categories include artificial intelligence workloads, video encoding, code compiling, file compression/decompression, high-performance computing, and other tasks.

When both processors were set to their highest power settings, the performance of the two AMD CPUs was superior to that of the Intel Xeon Gold 6421N 32 core. The Xeon 6421N was 2.7% faster than the 8324P when it was configured with its default settings, 2.5% slower when it was configured with its lowest adjustable TDP of 155W, and 5% faster when it was configured with the chip’s performance determinism mode.

It should not come as a surprise that the 8324PN ran at a little slower speed due to the lower power rating and base clock parameters. The Intel Xeon was 11.8% faster than the 8324PN in its stock configuration; however, the 8324PN was still able to outperform the chip in its performance determinism mode, achieving a 4.8% advantage over the Intel CPU.

AMD EPYC Siena Optimization

Even with performance determinism mode turned on, the 8324P and 8324PN were able to provide average power consumption ratings that were considerably below the 100W threshold. This was one of the many ways in which AMD prioritized power efficiency. On the other hand, Intel’s counterpart to Sapphire Rapids, which had an average power consumption rating of 137 watts, was unable to come even near to matching AMD’s level of power efficiency.

Phoronix’s testing has shown that AMD’s most recent Zen 4c core is quite powerful and is capable of producing performance that can compete with the absolute best that Intel has to offer right now. Although Intel may have beaten AMD to the E-core game with the release of Alder Lake, the most recent benchmarks demonstrate that AMD is capable of producing a delectable efficiency core that is capable of competing with Intel’s high-performance cores under certain conditions.

[digital-dynasty]

ARM-Prozessoren für Server: "Neoverse"-Rechenkerne vs. Intel Xeon und AMD Epyc

Kommende Serverprozessoren mit CPU-Kernen der Typen Neoverse V1 und Neoverse N2 rechnen laut ARM schneller als x86-Konkurrenten von AMD und Intel. Read more www.heise.de/news/…-... www.digital-dynasty.net/de/teamblogs/…

http://www.digital-dynasty.net/de/teamblogs/arm-prozessoren-fur-server-neoverse-rechenkerne-vs-intel-xeon-und-amd-epyc

[eu100tb]

Select Cheap Dedicated Servers Germany Plans

You can prevent sticker shock by signing a long-term contract with one of the cheap European dedicated server hosts and locking in the lowest rates for single-tenant hardware. Clients are assigned a specific server in a data center rack, and they can use a managed or unmanaged platform.

Single-tenant guarantee in a data center with rack-mounted hardware autonomy is the primary need for dedicated server hosting. In shared hosting, multiple users may use a single server. Virtual private server plans allow numerous users to share a single kernel and accompanying resources to support a single piece of hardware. Germany-dedicated server hosting can be purchased from different providers in bare metal, unmanaged, or managed configurations.

Understand the budgeting for Germany's dedicated servers:

Choosing the best cheap dedicated server plan can be overwhelming, but with some research and careful consideration, you can find a great option that fits your needs and budget. For example, a cheap 10gbps Germany server is essential for operating a video streaming website or a seedbox. Its monthly fees might begin at $120.

Cost-effective hosts offer single-tenant hardware at pricing that is competitive with VPS plans. On average, most dedicated server options cost between $450 and $499 per month. More than 10,000 people should be able to access the server at once.

VPS options can offer more significant configurations or faster performance with SSD storage drives and compete with cheaper dedicated server plans that cost less than $50 monthly. Paying for dedicated servers is a significant investment, so ensure you need one before making the plunge.

Tips for choosing the cheap dedicated server hosting plan:

Comparing hosting rates might help you locate the greatest deal on hardware in the business if you emphasize cost performance as determined by benchmark testing.

The best-dedicated server plans offer great value for the price, with plenty of cores, threads, RAM, and storage to meet your needs.

By conducting an IT audit on your resources, you can find exactly what you need before signing up for a dedicated server plan. By utilizing third-party benchmarks, you can quickly obtain performance information on the Intel Xeon and AMD EPYC CPUs provided by web host companies.

The commodity approach is excellent for bare metal server usage in a data center network. You can compare the CPU, RAM, storage (HDD vs. SSD), and bandwidth options, just like buying copper or sugar by the pound. This means you can find the best deals and save money.

It's great to have options when it comes to dedicated servers! While managed and unmanaged plans differ, bare metal plans offer affordable pricing and the flexibility to install the necessary stack. You can easily find managed plans with excellent customer service that provides live chat and quick response times.

Ask about a bulk of helpful information for choosing the best-dedicated server plans! With this information, you'll be able to make a wise decision and find the perfect plan to meet your needs: 

Growth in monthly page views for hosting resources is significant.

The Cloud software, websites, or mobile apps will require optimal web traffic.

When choosing plans, high-performance hardware and value for money are essential factors.

Apps can support many microservices, databases, and programming languages!

[dailytechnologynews]

AMD EPYC 7F72 vs. Intel Xeon Gold 6258R - Latest EPYC Rome vs. Xeon Cascade Lake Benchmarks https://ift.tt/3fL46qF

[bulletinwave]

Bit-Rauschen, the processor podcast from c't: AMD vs. Intel, the current status

Bit-Rauschen, the processor podcast from c’t: AMD vs. Intel, the current status

The bi-weekly processor podcast from c’t is available … At the beginning of the year, AMD brought out the “U” and “H” mobile versions of the Ryzen 5000, later followed by the Ryzen Threadripper Pro for workstations and, above all, the third generation of Epyc processors for servers (Epyc 7003 Milan). Intel has presented the Core i-11000 aka Rocket Lake and finally the first Xeons with 10…

[dellarmenia]

Dell+AMD+Intel: Building the Next-Gen PowerEdge Portfolio

Industry-standard server vendors’ product announcements often focus as much on the components that strategic partners provide as they do on new solutions. That is a natural approach since off-the-shelf components play vital roles in new system features and capabilities. So, it is sensible for vendors to spotlight their partners’ latest/greatest technologies.

That was certainly the case last week when Lenovo, HPE and Cisco Systems all launched new solutions highlighting the benefits offered by AMD’s new EPYC 7003 Series Processors. But one vendor – Dell – followed a considerably different path by announcing a portfolio of 17 new PowerEdge servers featuring both AMD EPYC 7003 and upcoming Intel Xeon Scalable processors. Let’s consider why the company broke from the server vendor pack and why that is important for Dell’s partners and customers, including those that work with the company’s OEM organization.

Splitting hairs or comprehensive storytelling? Some might say that I’m splitting hairs here in focusing on rhetorical trivia that will have little, if any, impact on actual events. After all, won’t other system vendors celebrate the launch of the new Xeon Scalable chips (aka Ice Lake) with new and refreshed servers when Intel makes its formal announcement on April 6?

Absolutely. It is arguable that giving AMD and Intel, along with their respective new silicon solutions, full individual attention accords them the respect they deserve and may be less confusing than trying to spread attention across a host of new server products featuring both companies’ chips. After all, complexity is often the enemy of simplicity, especially when it comes to communications.

However, complexity is not always or even necessarily an adversary. In fact, if you handle it with care, complexity can become an ally, especially in the service of telling full and comprehensive stories. That was Dell’s strategy—using new silicon features and functions to highlight server innovations resulting from both its partners’ and Dell’s own development efforts.

Those include eye-opening enhancements in system performance (including boosting workload-specific solutions), energy efficiency and system cooling, edge computing and security that span the entire PowerEdge portfolio. This approach also provided Dell the opportunity to emphasize the value of its recently announced Project Apex cloud-as-a-service solutions and its Flex on Demand offering for acquiring and paying for data center products.

What do customers and partners gain? Why is this approach important to or even preferable for Dell’s customers and partners? Most importantly, it provides valuable context for the improvements that the company is executing across all its server lines. Sure, new CPUs and GPUs have major roles in that effort but, as Dell noted, the new systems are also bolstered by 1,100 patents the company either owns or has filed. Plus, PowerEdge servers offer features exclusive to Dell, including the company’s Secured Component Verification and Root of Trust offerings.

It is also important to remember the relative competitive positions of AMD and Intel. While the former has enjoyed notable success under the leadership of CEO Lisa Su and her executive team, its data center market share remains well below 10% and its EPYC revenues/earnings are a fraction of what Intel derives from Xeon Scalable. The IT industry loves David vs. Goliath stories, but in practical terms, more data center customers care about Intel’s newest Xeon chips than AMD EPYC.

Finally, as companies approach the end of the traditional fiscal year, many are finalizing purchasing and development plans for the year ahead. That has been a fraught process for companies during the Covid-19 pandemic, so it is vital for vendors to provide as much clarity about new and near-term solutions as possible. This is a particularly important point for Dell’s sizable channel partner community and customers in its multi-billion-dollar OEM business whose businesses depend on long-term guidance.

Final analysis Like most portfolio refreshes, Dell’s new and upcoming server portfolio has much to like. In particular, the company’s new PowerEdge R6515 (AMD) and R750 (Intel) deliver notable boosts in performance for business-critical and highly virtualized applications. The same can be said for the new HPC- and AI-focused PowerEdge XE8545 (AMD) and R750xa (Intel), both of which feature NVIDIA GPUs and software solutions. Finally, Dell’s new Intel-based PowerEdge XR11 and XR12 ruggedized systems should significantly increase the options available for customers focused on building or enhancing edge computing environments.

Overall, by telling the story of its new PowerEdge portfolio in full, Dell has done right by its strategic silicon partners. More importantly, the company has also provided valuable information and actionable insights to its data center customers and channel community. By making complexity an ally, Dell has made itself a better ally to those who depend on it.